mercoledì 17 dicembre 2014

The figure of women during Fascism

During the early 20th century in Italy, the role of women and the structure of the family underwent a lot of change. When the Italian Fascist Party took control in 1922, there was a change in direction; women industrial workers were no longer accepted, and the party began a restoration of the traditional female role. 


The ideal of women as mothers and managers of the home became prevalent as the dominating values of fascism. The party used propaganda in order to promote the importance of family. The male-dominated Fascist Party had traditional misogynist views. As a result of fascist thinking about the role of women in the family, women faced poor treatment in almost all areas of daily life outside the home including politics, economics, and society. Even more, this type of treatment was upheld by fascist legislation that served to underline the male’s dominating rank. This legislation reinforced the patriarchal authority, barred women from paid wage labor, and took away their choice in decisions about reproduction. Motherhood quickly became associated primarily with the act of making babies rather than the traditional, maternal values like love, guidance, and care. Women became like machines. Procreation basically came to define their social role and the authorities were determined to implement these newly defined roles for women by suppressing illegitimate sexuality, like prostitution, from public consumption. In addition, they set up numerous policies and incentives to emphasize women’s roles as mothers. For example, abortion was considered a crime. The government also issued family allocations, maternity insurance, birth and marriage loans, and career preferment for fathers of big families, as well as organizing special institutions for infant and family health and welfare. Unfortunately, even though these policies to some extent recognized women as political subjects, they failed to grant real privileges to women.When Mussolini came into power, implementing these policies, his regime tactics proved to take a lot from women, acting to exploit them in various ways. This held true especially for working-class and peasant women. 


First, fascists sought greater control over the already traditional role of the female, particularly motherhood. For example, in 1934, a law was passed that expanded benefits and coverage for women employed in industry. As a result, these women were given a two-month paid “compulsory leave.” They were also guaranteed time off to breast-feed newborns until they were a year old and the government provided feeding rooms for nursing women working in factories that employed more than fifty working women so they could breast-feed their babies at work. Furthermore, women were allotted a lump-sum payment when they gave birth, which immediately gave them a two-month wage when they had a baby.  Additionally, to offset the costs of big families, the party looked to make childbearing seem as if it were a service to the state. To do so, the government set aside a day to honor mothers and distributed various posters that showed motherhood as a national duty for women. Thus, Mother’s Day came to celebrate prolific mothers and especially recognize those mothers who had the most children. Women were constantly reminded of the importance and honor of being a mother of many children. 

The government gave women a lot of incentives to have large families. However, unlike in liberal states, like Finland, that extended political rights with social welfare services, Italy did the opposite. Where the interest was to promote the Italian nation, the welfare of the infant superseded that of the mother. So, while propaganda insisted that, naturally, women were only contented in motherhood and that childbearing was a “biological destiny,” government social services doubted whether women were naturally the best nurturers and questioned the control traditionally given to female kinship and community networks over childbirth and infant nurturing. Consequently, Italian mothers of all classes were made to feel incompetent, apprehensive, and dependent - that they needed male intervention in order to make correct decisions about motherhood. 

Nevertheless, even with all the restrictions, there was evidence of women’s resistance to fascist policies. Even though many remained politically passive, a decline in birth rates shows that others did not submit to pro-natalist policies. Even when poverty and prejudices limited the use of the only legally available contraceptive, condoms, they turned to alternative measures such as makeshift abortions to stop pregnancies. Although these alternative practices were more dangerous, it showed that women were determined to maintain a conscious effort in controlling their fertility in a state that sought to dictate women’s positions and duties to the state.

In conclusion, it is clear that Fascism worked to bring women back into their traditional roles as mothers and managers of the home by means of new legislation and propaganda. The new fascist policies served to help women, but at the same time exploit them in various ways that benefited the state. 

martedì 16 dicembre 2014

The Tunisian woman during the French colonialism.

This week I will analyze the role of women in Tunisia during the French colonial period.
France by signing up of the Treaty of Bardo in 1881 established a protectorate in Tunisia. Tunisia was compelled having to give up in to this condition because of the weakness of its military and its resistance movements, all this was aggravated by the state of bankruptcy in which it poured.
The impact of colonial influenced hopelessly on local culture thanks to the assimilation of the Europeans uses and customs. The French penetration and the subsequent struggle for political dominance they found strong class conflicts and they bring out the woman question that it’s closely linked to the issue of nationalism.
For Tunisian women Western influence has different consequences that it cannot always be defined favorable. But this process has also allowed changes as the weakening and disintegration of the social traditions and of male patriarchy that excluded women from important areas of public life.
The debate on the contrast between Western values and those natives, and debates on nationalism merged with women's issues; it and the issue of the veil merge in the history of struggles for the game colonial and resistance to Western influences. Another factor that has influenced the issue of women it is related to the intellectual and cultural rebirth, Nahda.
Between the nineteenth and twentieth century all these factors have led researchers and Muslim intellectuals to question the woman issue. They begin to discuss the need for female literacy. This is because the liberation of women is a basic requirement for the modernization and the liberation of the whole society.
It call into question the legitimacy of polygamy and easy divorce for the men; this is because they try to start a process of modernization of Islam. To be able to achieve this it was necessary to abandon the anti-feminist practices produced by local culture and customs for the benefit of Europeans.
The discourse of colonialism does nothing but change the language of feminism making key motive of its attack on the Islamic societies that keep segregated women, why are societies deserve to be subjugated or replaced.
It is strongly criticized the meaning of marriage as a mere instrument of sexual fulfillment. The object of the colonial language is to attack local societies. At the same time the colonized are seen slaves of colonial domination that exerts a gratuitous violence against their traditions.
All this leads the educated classes and the upper classes to discuss the issue of women. At the end of the nineteenth century, the idea takes root that the emancipation of women is crucial to put end the negative influences of a society controlled by males.
The change of women in Tunisian society is highlighted by clothing. Women are more visible in the public and in the streets, and their custom is gradually changing. The women from the upper classes have the opportunity to visit European cities without having the obligation to wear the veil.
Despite all these changes, however, the role of women is always subjected to that of the male, based on the concept of Islam on the difference between the sexes. This is thought to be rooted above all in the tribes whereas in wealthy families the women should receive adequate education and she can assimilate the customs and traditions of the West.

To have a tangible change not only the company but also the Tunisian law must wait for 1956, with the declaration of independence and the reform of the Code of Personal Status.

Belgian Women during the Nazi occupation

This week, I have decided to focus on the situation of Belgian women during the German occupation of 1940-1945. One does not need to be an expert to know that living in this period was hell. Food was extremely scarce, and money was not abundant either. Tickets for food were given at the City Hall. Everyone had to go there with their Identity Card in order to know in which category they belonged: pregnant women were allowed the biggest ration of food; Jews were only allowed a tiny quantity. The only way to get more food was to buy some at the illegal black markets. During the Nazi occupation, Belgian women lived in constant fear. They tried their best to feed and protect their family while trying not to think about the fact that their husbands may never come back from the war.
 
One Belgian woman who decided it was time for her to take actions in order to do some good during the Second World War is Andrée de Jongh. Born in Brussels in 1916, Andrée was only 24 years old when the German occupation started. When the war broke out, she resigned from her previous job and began to work as a nurse for the Red Cross. She helped wounded soldiers to recover and when they were fit enough to walk again, Andrée sent them to safe houses.

However, nursing wounded soldiers was not enough for her. She wanted to do more to help them and so, she decided to found a resistance group. Women leaders of resistance groups were extremely rare. She knew how risky her project was, but she decided to go through with it anyway. In an interview she gave in 2000, Andrée recalls: "When war was declared I knew what needed to be done. There was nohesitation. We could not stop what we had to do although we knew the cost. Even if it was at the expense of our lives, we had to fight until the last breath.

Andrée created an escape network for Allied soldiers, and especially airmen, to help them escape from occupied Belgium and to reach Britain. The line started in Belgium, crossing France, climbing the Pyrenees Mountains and then reaching the British consulate in Madrid, Spain. Her resistance group was called the “Comet Escape Line” because of the unusual speed at which she managed to help Allied soldiers escape. Over 3000 members joined the Comet Line. Allied soldiers were sent to Spain through the Comet Line in small groups to avoid being noticed. Andrée de Jongh accompanied these groups more than thirty times. She said that it was best if she made the journey with them because women attracted less attention from the German army than men and it would look less suspicious. She was so involved in helping these soldiers escaping that she even sold her own jewelry in order to afford the journey. In total, Andrée personally helped 118 Allied men to reach Britain.

But during one of her many journeys to Spain, Andrée got arrested by the Nazis. The Gestapo tortured her in order to get information out of her. She tried to struggle as long as she could but eventually she gave in. She admitted that she was the founder and the leader of the Comet Escape Line. As incredible as it may sound, when Andrée told the Germans the truth, they did not believe her. In their opinion, it was impossible that a woman was the leader of a resistance party. The image that society had of women at that time actually saved Andrée’s life. Instead of killing her right away, the Nazis sent her in a concentration camp. She was freed in 1945 when the war was over.

For her heroic efforts during the war, Andrée de Jongh received numerous rewards from the United States, Britain, France and Belgium. In 1985, this incredibly brave woman was made a Countess by the Belgian King Baudouin. She died in 2007 at the age of 90.

Sources:
https://books.google.be/books?id=yN_17svfqSQC&pg=PA126&lpg=PA126&dq=belgian+women+world+war+II&source=bl&ots=wU5AMQ7f1J&sig=3sKxMe3AbTGKsz_XoCrPcwsT1UY&hl=fr&sa=X&ei=nw6PVKOHBYX5UMGGg4AP&ved=0CFIQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1566506/Andree-de-Jongh.html

lunedì 15 dicembre 2014

Women's rights in the Socialist Yugoslavia

Last week, we wrote about speeches. Today, I would like to start my post by mentioning the speech of Josiph Broz Tito at the First Assembly of the People’s Movement for Liberation from Fascism (Narodna Oslobodlacka Borba) in 1942.

Someone may ask: what has it to do with women’s rights in the Former Yugoslavia?
For what concerns Italy’s and Yugoslavia’s paths to women’s emancipation, they are very different, but they have also something in common: a lot of rights were given to women in both countries after women’s active participation in the Second World War. Tito’s speech is the clearest sign of that. He opened the Assembly by saying that he was honored to be the head of such a brave and valuable army full of women. He underlined that all people of Yugoslavia should have been grateful for having brave and strong daughters who fought in the first lines of the army.

In 1946, the new Constitution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was promulgated and, for the first time, women’s political, social and economic rights were formally recognized as a result of their participation in the anti-fascist Resistance. The provisions dedicated to women’s equality were modeled on the 1936 Soviet Constitution. In the article 24 of the Yugoslav Constitution, it was stated that: “Women have equal rights with men in all fields of state, economic and social-political life.” This statement reflected a radical revolutionary stance on class, gender and national inequalities. As a matter of fact, during the old kingdom of Yugoslavia (1918-1941), the family law, which included women’s rights, was divided into six different juridical areas. The new legislation overcame discriminatory treatments of women based on their geographical origin, economic status and religious behaviors. 
In the article 24, women’s “difference” as mothers was inscribed: “Women have the right to the same pay as that received by men for the same work, and as workers or employees, they enjoy special protection. The State especially protects the interests of mothers and children by the establishment of maternity hospitals, children’s homes and the nurseries, and by the right of mothers to leave with pay before and after childbirth.” This described the idea of “social motherhood” that was very important in the post-war period in Yugoslavia. As a matter of fact, motherhood was recognized by the State as a social contribution.

In the 1970s, Yugoslavia had undergone a rapid process of modernization and urbanization. Even though women’s literacy and presence in the labour-market rose, women’s full equality was far from being realized. A new Constitution of Socialist-Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was promulgated in 1974. Women’s political, social and economic rights were reaffirmed in the article 154. In this article, there is the prohibition of national, racial, gender, linguistic, and religious discrimination. In the new Constitution, women were not described as mothers; as a matter of fact, they are not even mentioned as women, but as part of the working-class. One of the main features of the 1974 Constitution is the particular attention given to the prohibition of national discrimination, more than other typologies of discriminations.

In conclusion, from the Yugoslav Kingdom to dissolution of Yugoslavia, women experimented different status as citizens. In the Constitution of 1946, women were “mothers”; in the Constitution of 1974, they were “workers”; they have never been considered “women” during the communist period. Formally, they had the same rights as men, but practically, they were discriminated. As a matter of fact, in the 1970s and 1980s, feminist activists denounced the failure of egalitarian policies and exposed the gap between formal rhetoric and the persistent gender discrimination, which is confirmed by the sexiest imagery of the press and the diffusion of domestic violence.
It is very important to remember also that the feminist movements of the area have never stopped to fight for more rights, but their work has never been taken into consideration by the state authorities. 


References:


http://www.arhivyu.gov.rs/active/sr-latin/home/glavna_navigacija/leksikon_jugoslavije/konstitutivni_akti_jugoslavije/ustav_sfrj_1974.html

http://dediserver.eu/hosting/ethnodoc/data/YU19740221-2.pdf

http://www.arhivyu.gov.rs/active/sr-latin/home/glavna_navigacija/leksikon_jugoslavije/konstitutivni_akti_jugoslavije/ustav_fnrj.html

http://www.arhivyu.gov.rs/index.php?download_command=attachment&file_command=download&file_id=42688&file_type=oFile&modul=Core%3A%3AFileManagement%3A%3AcFileModul



giovedì 11 dicembre 2014

Emma Watson's UN speech

Today I have decided to talk to you about Emma Watson’s speech that she gave on the 20th of September 2014 at the United Nations in New-York. Recently appointed UN Women Goodwill Ambassador, the British actress made this speech within the framework of the launch of the HeForShe campaign, which aim is to raise people’s awareness about gender inequalities. In particular, Emma Watson targeted her speech towards men. Through her ten-minute speech, she formally invites boys and men to join the fight against gender inequalities and tells them that this issue concerns them too. This particular point is what the HeForShe campaign is all about. How are we supposed to change things concerning gender differences if only half of the world feels welcome in the conversation?  

Emma Watson begins her speech by reminding her audience of the exact definition of the word “feminism”, which is the belief that men and women should have the same rights and opportunities. She also highlights the fact that the term “feminism” has become very unpopular today, and that many people are reluctant to call themselves “feminist” because of that. However, it is the idea behind the word that matters, not the word in itself. 

In my opinion, Emma Watson is a very talented speaker. Although we can feel her stress – and who can blame her, one does not deliver a speech at the UN every day – she addresses her audience in a very articulate and modest way. Her speech was written in a very smart way: she begins her talk by saying “I am reaching out to you because we need your help”. By using this expression, Watson makes the listener feel that he is included in what she is talking about and catches her audience’s attention. Moreover, her body language is very good too. Through her 10 minutes of speech, she manages to create eye contact with the whole audience, making every member of the assembly involved in her campaign.

Her speech contains several catch phrases, such as “If not me, who? If not now, when?”, that are excellent to seize and keep her audience’s attention. In my opinion, one of the strongest moments of her speech is when she repeats the sentence “I think it is right” four times ("Why has the word become such an uncomfortable one? I am from Britain, and I think it is right I am paid the same as my male counterparts. I think it is right that I should be able to make decisions about my own body. I think it is right that women be involved on my behalf in the policies and decisions that will affect my life. I think it is right that socially, I am afforded the same respect as men."). The audience applauses her for the first time right after this paragraph; this is the proof that her catch sentences worked.

Contrastive pairs can also be found in her speech, such as: “If men don’t have to be aggressive in order to be accepted, women won’t feel compelled to be submissive. If men don't have to control, women won't have to be controlled".

In her speech, Emma Watson is definitely not criticizing men. On the contrary, she is officially inviting them to join the fight against gender inequalities.

Here is a link to the whole speech transcript. 

Sources:
http://www.heforshe.org/  
http://sociology.about.com/od/Current-Events-in-Sociological-Context/fl/Full-Transcript-of-Emma-Watsons-Speech-on-Gender-Equality-at-the-UN.htm
http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2014/oct/03/emma-watsons-un-gender-equality-campaign-is-an-invitation-to-men-too

mercoledì 10 dicembre 2014

Inspiring change - International Women Day 2014


The International Women’s Day (IWD) is declared by the United Nations and it is recognized worldwide on March 8 of each year. For the 2014 edition, the theme chosen for the event was: Inspiring change. The celebration is marked by the traditional message of the Secretary General of the United Nations.

The aim of the speech is to make the worldwide public opinion aware on the issue of the role of women, on what has been done so far and, in particular, what has to be done.
The structure is quite common. The Secretary General starts with greetings and thanks and then, he talks about the importance of the remembrance of the event.
After that, he refers to some personal events, such as the meeting with an activist against Female Genital Mutilation and the visit in Sierra Leone to close the UNs mission; and to some public events such as the Beijing Women’s Conference and 58th Commission on the Status of Women. Before concluding, he goes on to the heart of the speech, in which the Secretary General highlights the importance of achieving equality for women and girls.

During the entire speech he uses the pronoun “we” and verbs like “must or “have to” in order to indicate that the issue is a global responsibility and, in particular in this case, it concerns the whole world.
In his speech he uses one of the most common tool of eliciting approval, the use of the list of three:

“There is peace.  There is opportunity.  There is hope”.
“Take the message forward in your homes, your workplaces, your schools”.
“Countries with higher levels of gender equality have higher economic growth. Companies with more women on their Boards have higher returns. Peace agreements that include women are more successful.”

In this way the Secretary General underlines that the achievement of equality for women is the essential key to the progress of all of us, not only of the female gender.

Concluding, the history of the International Women’s Day is rich in stories of courage, perseverance, resistance, change, inspiration, and celebration. However, there is still much to be done on different and important issues such as the achievement of the economic equality, the equal presence in business and politics, and above all, the extirpation of violence against women and of gender discrimination.

Hillary Rodham Clinton's speech to the U.N. 4th World Conference on Women

http://youtu.be/xXM4E23Efvk

On the 5th September 1995 in Beijing, the 4th World Conference on Women was taking place, during which the Beijing Declaration and Platform was approved. The Beijing Declarations is a global commitment for achieving equity, development and peace for women worldwide. One of the speakers during the Conference was Hillary Rodham Clinton.

I have chosen to analyze this particular speech because it reflects some principles about gender issues that appear also today in Hilary R. Clinton’s political guidelines.
The aim of this speech was to introduce the Conference by expressing the biggest issues to face in order to achieve the goals presented in the Declaration of Beijing.

The structure of the speech is simple: it starts with thanks, then there is the explanation of the reason why this Conference is so important, followed by a short but strong critic to those who questioned the Conference. The speech continues with the work of International Organizations, historical experiences about gender issues in different countries and a short outline of who this speech is addressed to. Before the conclusion, she lists the major goals to achieve about freedom and human rights of women around the world, and she gives a little personal experience of discrimination in her country.

When she illustrates the main discriminations women face in the world, she tends to use long lists in order to emphasize how wide and interrelated are the issues regarding women.
During quite all the speech, the speaker uses the pronoun “we” in order to indicate: firstly that the issues she listed are not only about women, but involves everyone, and secondly, that there is a need to work together to obtain more effective results. The pronoun “I” is also used frequently to underline her personal involvement in the work and to shear her experiences. Few times she creates antithesis by using the pronoun “they”, precisely she does it when she criticizes those who questions the utility and the importance of the Conference.

It is also interesting to notice that she constantly uses active verbs to point out that the situation about women’s rights and freedom is developing and that there are a lot of organizations and individuals that work on that.
As far as rhetorical speech is concerned, she uses some powerful expressions such as: “The history of women has been the history of silence” ( the use of present perfect is very eloquent in this sentence) and “Let it be that human rights are women’s rights and women’s rights are human rights once and for all” suggest the strength and determination of the future actions of those who will join the Beijing Declaration.

She argues that women’s rights are human rights, and in order to highlight that, she repeats seven times the structure “It is a violation of human rights when...” followed by all the discrimination women face everyday. It is a smart way to demonstrate that it is impossible to defend human rights without standing for women’s rights.
She concludes the speech by saying: “Time is now”, and by calling everyone to act in order to achieve more effective results. 

Speech of the Queen Rania al Abdullah of Jordan


This week I decided to analyze this speech because in the speech given by Queen Rania al Abdllah during the International Women's Day in 2008, the main theme is the support to the development of the leader figure of the woman.
The Queen calls her listeners "true global citizens" making them feel part of her speech, but most direct actors in the international scenery. In this way, the Queen has established a direct relationship with the public and this can be concluded from the use of the constant pronoun "we". All are responsible for the condition of women in the world and they all need to work together so that women can become leaders in various fields.
The Queen continues her speech by bringing the data related to education of women and that this has led to improvements. In particular, in Arab societies, today educated woman performs important social roles greatly improving the society. They emerges from this speech are messages optimistic and hopeful; listeners are encouraged to believe that greater support by States and private companies can bring the woman to be a leader especially in the economic world. In fact, the Queen emphasizes the capacity of women in the management of microfinance. Only giving opportunities and educating the woman can have good results.


This can be observed also by the words most frequently used by the Queen as womens, leadership, coalition, arab, work, etc. etc ..
The Queen's speech can be divided into various parts:
- A part where the Queen thank for the invitation and she recalled the importance of this event
- A part where the Queen emphasizes the importance of supporting the development of women
- A part where she talks about the importance of women in the Arab leadership and her role in the economy
- And in the end, when she remembers the action activist Alicia Paul and her march to the abolition of the 19th amendment, which she remembers from this example is that we have to find the strength to work together for the realization of a world of justice, equality and hope.
The Queen's speech is not addressed only to the listeners present, but to all so that everyone can work together to achieve this goal.

giovedì 4 dicembre 2014

Pride or prejudice?



Although during the last years campaigns against gender discrimination were increasingly and globally supported, we can see how the role of women is still influenced by stereotypes. In this post we will see an example of how media, which in the age of technology should break down certain stereotypes related to old beliefs or specific social patterns, actually are used for just the opposite.

Most of us have probably heard about Samantha Cristoforetti, the Italian astronaut. Last week Samantha left the Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan with two other astronauts, for a six-month mission aboard the International Space Station (ISS). For Italy it is a historic moment because she is the first Italian female astronaut in space. Despite this, no TV program talked about the launch or at most, the event occupied five minutes during the news. This happens because in a country like Italy it doesn’t matter if you're an astronaut, a manager, an engineer or whatever, just because you're a woman your role is devalued, belittled. This happens because the image of women, as is given by media in our country, is that of an object covered by glitter. It doesn’t matter if a woman has certain skills, because if you have to let her talk is just to let her talk nonsense. The only important thing is that her body reflects specific standards of beauty. This explains why, few days after the event, a lot of sexist comments, like “someone had to wash the dishes aboard the ISS” or jokes about the not womanhood of Samantha, appeared on the main social networks. Thus, there is still a lot to do so that the efforts we make every day against gender discrimination are not waste in this way.

mercoledì 3 dicembre 2014

Hakima Darhmouch: Queen of the French-speaking Belgian television



This blog post is going to draw our attention to the situation of women in the very small but very worth knowing country that is Belgium, and more particularly on the situation of women in the Belgian media landscape. Although the proportion of women in the Belgian journalistic world has tremendously increased over the last ten years, today men are still more numerous than women in that field. A study carried out in 2013 shows that only a third of the Belgian journalists were women. In 2003, only 20% were women.

One great example of a woman who succeeded in showing that she deserves her place in the Belgian media sphere in undoubtedly Hakima Darhmouch. This 36 Belgian journalist of Moroccan origin has become one of the most appreciated figures of the French-speaking Belgian television. After her bachelor in communications in Brussels, Hakima Darhmouch started to work as a journalist at the bottom of the scale and became ten years later an anchor of the TV news on the private French-speaking channel of Belgian television (RTL-TVI). She also worked as the communication director of a famous Belgian politician (Louis Michel). She appears passionate, modest, professional and very close to her viewers partly thanks to her activity on her Twitter account. I think that her success should be an inspiration for every young Belgian girl – whatever social class they may come from – who wishes to pursue a career in the very manly world that is television in Belgium. She managed to break down the negative stereotypes that unfortunately a lot of people have about people of Northern African origins and she became, during her thirties, one of the ‘stars’ of Belgian television. 

In my opinion, Hakima Darhmouch is the proof that with work, effort and ambition, it is possible to achieve your goals, even when you come from a modest background. The Belgian media landscape could definitely use more people like Hakima to reduce the gap between male and female journalists.